I will state up front that I have
never taught a Primary language arts class.
So how’s this? I’m now going to write
a blog post about teaching writing in the Primary grades, as an Intermediate
teacher!
This is why I feel I am qualified to
do so: many of those little primary learners eventually ended up in my grade 7
and 8 classes. I would have liked them to have had a “do-over”… a second chance
at gaining expressive skills, and building on success from year to year.
My reason for writing is to muse and
wonder about the use of technology in day-to-day writing classes in the primary
grades:
- At what age or grade do we start supporting students with
technology as an integral part of their program?
- What is the value of restricting children to printing or
writing by hand, especially those with an identification?
- How much time should be spent on that, relative to learning
effective technology-based writing tools?
- Considering the the SAMR model, is writing in primary something we
should measure against SAMR? Or not?
- Is it time to go multi-modal in all aspects of literacy? Will that
help us as teachers foster the 6Cs of 21st century learning?
In writing this post, I got interested in comparing the
SAMR model (substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition) to the way
we foster writing skills in the continuum of grades from K to 8. Can we re-define writing, and still have it count as writing?
Here
are some results of a simple definition search for the word “writing.” They
range from very limited, to definitions that are open to 21st
century interpretation.
Here
are two old-school definitions:
· Google: the activity or
skill of marking coherent words on paper and composing text.
· Merriam-Webster: the act or process of one who writes, such as: the
act or art of forming visible letters or characters.
But
personally, I was intrigued by the following definitions.
· Free Dictionary: The act or process of
producing and recording words in a form that can be read and understood.
· Wikipedia: Writing is
a medium of human communication that represents language and emotion through
the inscription or recording of signs and symbols.
I
know that for some teachers, this topic is old news, and something they have examined
in their own practice over a period of years. For example, one of Aviva
Dunsiger’s posts that I have cited below is from 2010… However, I believe there
are many other teachers who have not reflected on this, or who hold strong
beliefs on methods of teaching writing without technology. This means that our
schools are taking a wide range of approaches, and I’m not sure that students
en masse benefit.
Is it still a valid teaching strategy
to have a whole class of grade 1 or 2 students write a journal entry in a
notebook every day? Is it really necessary that young, identified
students struggle every day with their pencil and paper? I know they certainly struggled in grade 8, in the years before classroom technology.
Based on my Grade 7 and 8 students, my
observation is that this kind of routine is not the best way to build a
confident writer. It builds a school-hater instead.
I frequently saw the results in Intermediate
- the students arrive still unable to formulate a written piece longer than a
sentence or two, or maybe a paragraph. Even worse to me was what I called
"self-limiting" or "self-censoring." This what occurs when
a student who struggles with written output learns how to write the absolute
minimum to avoid having the teacher tell them to complete their work. These
well-informed, articulate and opinionated young people would simply write the
shortest sentences in the shortest paragraphs, in order to pass under the
radar. And then be able to shrug off any suggestion to extend their thinking.
As they were also moving into grades where marks count and permit access to
some careers, this was heartbreaking on a number of levels.
These were bright kids, full of
creative ideas. In Grade 1 or 2, we might say that they were unable to get this
onto the paper. By grade 8, they are unwilling as well as unable.
I found it extremely difficult to
reverse this mindset and raise ability levels in the course of one year, for
the following reason.
For me, the worst realization of all
happened when we began to see the availability of SEA laptops and iPods and
audio recorders for some students, combined with more computer lab time. Even
with new tools available, the self-limiting was so ingrained that they still
struggled to express themselves in a grade-appropriate manner.
So my final question is: why are we
waiting "until they are older" to provide daily tech support as an
integral part of our students' programs?
I think it would be great if primary
students were able to use speech-to-text apps or audio recorders as a matter of
course, to support not just their day-to-day learning but to build patterns of
thinking and expression that are a true reflection of their capabilities.
Not to mention the wide range of
multi-modal apps such as Adobe Spark that truly open up the “writing”
experience.
Here are a few inspiring and
thought-provoking sources:
Beth
Holland, Redefining
the Writing Process With iPads
Edutopia,
November 26, 2013
With what we'll call Writing
3.0, students and teachers can:
· Organize and draft through handwriting,
drawing, text and voice
· Collaborate and incorporate multimodal
feedback
· Create a final product that demonstrates
mastery and communicates understanding beyond the literal confines of paper
Dr.
Kristi Meeuwse, Using
the iPad for Writing in Kindergarten
iTeach with iPads Blog, February 16, 2016
Aviva
Dunsiger – Is It
Writing?
Living
Avivaloca, April 11, 2015
Aviva
Dunsiger – Redefining
Writing
Living
Avivaloca, January 16, 2010
No comments:
Post a Comment